- Thesis: The army does not have to be redone completely and from a scratch, but transformed slowly through constructive practical changes which take place throughout reforms, and innovative implementations.
2. The American army has to meet up with time requirements.
- It has to use its base as an existing tool to reform.
- The achievements of the army have to be treated with respect and practical purposes.
- We have to understand that the army is a product of its time.
3. Changes in the army have to be as painless as possible, so the soldiers are able to adapt.
- It is very important to take human factor into consideration.
- Changes have to go slowly while using the experience the army has.
- Fundamental changes will come as a result of gradual transformations.
4. Many people think the army the way it is now should not exist.
- Army puts pressure on individuals and society.
- There are many ineffective tactics and strategies.
- We have to implement changes.
- Changes are essential for the army, but they have to come slowly so the soldiers are willing to accept them.
At the present moment, American army faces a lot of criticism with people saying it has to be redone from scratch. The critics believe that our army does not meet up with requirements of the modern time, and must be redone completely . Nevertheless, one believes that such immediate changes will only lead to havoc and chaos in the army. The changes must come but as reforms and fundamental processes. The army does not have to be redone completely and from a scratch but transformed slowly through constructive practical changes which take place throughout reforms and innovative implementations. This way, it will be possible to prepare people for changes and use the base we already have.
300writers is your best place to buy argumentative essay online. Get amazing argumentative paper on any topic for the low price.
After all, the main idea of the army is that it has to meet up with time requirements. We already have a strong army school with rich experience. Thus, we can use it and its achievements as well as flaws to determine what has to be reformed and changed. Also, we cannot just get rid or forget about the history of the army which has been there with us for years. Our army had its ups and downs, but it is a part of American culture which always has to be remembered and used while renovating the army now. We have to understand that the army is a product of its time, so we have to add new things into it which are needed now, but use the strong base that cements the army and makes it strong.
Thus, one believes that changes in the army have to be as painless as possible, so the soldiers are able to adapt. The human factor in the army is very important, so while thinking about changes, it is mandatory to think about people who will have to deal with them. The experience soldiers have will help them to adapt to reasonable changes. Only with small steps, it will be possible to change the mentality of soldiers and the society toward army, and that will lead to the fundamental shifts for the better in the future.
It is true that there are many people who think the army the way it is now should not exist because it does not work the way they expect. Critics state that soldiers are being pressured by the army because they cannot get out, and the society feels obliged to soldiers which leads to further complications . The army also uses old-fashioned tools and tactics which are outdated. These things do have the place in the army, and there is no doubt that the army must change. Society as a whole has to be there to implement changes, but these changes do not have to ruin what we have but make it better.
There is no arguing that positive changes are needed for the army, but they have to come slowly so the soldiers are willing to accept them. We have to transform the army using the base we have, paying attention to the human factor, and adapting to time requirements so, throughout the transformation process, the army remains effective and able to protect the nation. We need to make the army constantly seek improvement instead of ruining everything during a single moment of time.
- Brimley, Shawn, and Scharr, Paul. "Ctrl+Alt+Delete. Resetting America's Military." Foreign Policy. Published May 13, 2014. Accessed August 12, 2014.
- Snider, Don M., and Watkins, Gayle L. "The Future of Army Professionalism: A Need for Renewal and Redefinition." Parameters. Autumn 2000. Pp. 5-20.
- Don M. Snider, & Gayle L. Watkins, "The Future of Army Professionalism: A Need for Renewal and Redefinition," Parameters, Autumn 2000, p. 5.